Skip to main content

Once Upon a Time - by James Dillon

Once Upon a Time 

 James Dillon





When the premiere of a work called ‘Once Upon a Time’ at the Huddersfield Festival of 1980,  James Dillon was immediately thrust centre stage.  Hitherto, James Dillon's success had been variable.  Mainly learning his craft in libraries rather than formal institutions and without the prospect of a performance at the end, many of his early pieces were left incomplete.  The first substantial work Babble (1974-6) was a brief glimpse of things to come.  Although now James Dillon disregards the rigorous architectural design in which everything 'is mapped out despite the material'.  After the first section was rehearsed by the newly formed Charles Ives Choir who were perplexed by some of the graphic notation, the work was abandoned.   His momentary interest in serialism in ‘Dillug-Kefitsah’ (1976) encouraged James Dillon to examine the seemingly paradoxical notion of a 'parametrical discipline' working against an ‘experimental freedom’.  As a result, he had cultivated such a real sense of artistry that he was enabled to publicly document his 'first work'.    Finally, he had begun to unshackle himself from the problems of infrastructure which had dogged his earlier works (a difficulty which is perhaps more evident for a largely self-taught composer).  However, this work was not yet a solution to the kind of schism between ‘process’ and ‘form’ that he had encountered in the earlier work ‘Babble’.  What was needed was a completed re-evaluation of the process of composition.  Around this time, Xenakis produced his inspired thoughts on the essential aspects of composition in a book called Formalised Music.  Now, James Dillon was encouraged to reject the notion of heterophony (counterpoint, melody, harmony) and serialism that was very much a concern of his contemporaries for an amorphous texture generated by generalised principles.   Perhaps unconsciously, James Dillon was about to create his own individual style as characterised in ‘Once Upon a Time’.  However, and this is perhaps what makes James Dillon such an interesting figure, such a straightforward analysis of his early work as a composer is somewhat naïve, especially when the two previous works written around the same time are taken into consideration.  The solo clarinet work ‘Crossing Over’(1978) uses material from a wide range of sources and so does the solo drum work that followed, ‘Ti.re-Ti.ke-Dha’(1979).  The title of the latter work is derived from the verbal instructions given to drummers of North Indian Classical Music (‘Dha’ indicates both hands in the centre; ‘Ti’ is a kind of 'rim-shot' etc...).  Combinations of words indicate a ‘Tal’ or a repetitive rhythmic pattern and the title of the James Dillon piece appears to be a fragment of one just like the third and fourth beats of the Ektål:

1          2          3          4
Dhin     Dhin     Dhage  Ti.ra.ki.ta etc...


In this respect, James Dillon’s music represents an apparent contradiction; rigorous in terms of application but derived from a diverse inspiration. This indicates a powerfully creative but strongly independent mind.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Dillon_(composer)

http://www.fonemaconsort.com/blog-archives/#james-dillon

Popular posts from this blog

What is Stockhausen's legacy?

Karlheinz Stockhausen is one of the most important composers of the post war era. He is partially responsible for the creation of the post war modernist music.   But what is his true legacy? Was he the leading composer in his field? Did he invent the 'timbralist' idea of generating music from a single sound? Well, he did accomplish that concept with  "Stimmung'' (Voice) which is completely designed around the single chord of a B flat ninth . But he wasn't the first.  Giacinto Scelsi wrote "Quatro pezzi per orchestre" which is based a single note per movement and that work was written in 1959. Quatro pezzi per orchestre - Scelsi I seriously doubt whether Stockhausen knew about Scelsi's achievement when he wrote Stimmung in 1977. Perhaps one of his greatest works  is " Gruppen'' (Groups) composed for three orchestras. Did it change the way we use the orchestra?  He was a pioneer, especially in the early stages of hi

In the shadow of a genius.

Recently, I have discovered a fascinating revelation about the composers we admire so much.  That behind many geniuses, there usually is a predecessor lurking in the background.  It reminds of that often quoted phrase by Picasso A  good  artist borrows and  great  artist steals Now, I am not suggesting that the composers who I mention are stealing peoples' ideas - there is no evidence to support that fact.  However, I am suggesting that the idea of a genius who came from nowhere may not be accurate.  Let's take the case of Ernest Fanelli.  Who? You might ask.  He is a significant but unknown person in the development of impressionism.  He is an Italian born composer living in Paris.  He composed a good deal of 'new' music at the end of the nineteenth century.  His ideas were quite radical; his instrumentation included harmonics, sul pont., he used wordless choruses.  Unfortunately, he wasn't as talented a composer as Debussy and his music wasn'